Potter’s Hands Revisited

1 Comment

I shoot a lot of photos. Of all the shots I take, I probably only process about 5-10% of the images. This is due to a few reasons.

The first is time. While it only takes a fraction of a second to capture the scene, it takes a bit longer to do the post-processing. Since I shoot in RAW mode (more on this in an upcoming post), any image I want to use requires some times spent in front of the computer editing.

The second reason is duplication. Shooting digital photos is cheap. Unlike the film days, taking multiple shots doesn’t cost any more than taking a single photo (other than wear and tear on the camera shutter). When I find an interesting subject, I often will take 5-10 photos of it from various angles at different exposures. Because of this I have a lot of different versions (in my archives) of photos that I have already edited and displayed.

Today’s capture is one of these shots. I have been re-visiting my archives recently looking for photos from the past that I could process. I originally edited a black & white version of this shot with a tighter crop. This time I left it in color and opted to show more of the pottery wheel.

On rainy days, it’s nice to have a backlog of shots to wade through. You never know what you’ll find.

Canon 30D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/320 second, f/6.3, ISO 160

April 21, 2007 at 7:40 am by | Categories: Post

With Springtime Come the Tulips

1 Comment

When creating this capture of a tulip, I sought to avoid the typical style of flower shot that is so common this time of year – Pretty. My goal was to communicate a different feeling by including the dirty gloved hands, the plant’s root ball and the gardener’s body.

I originally shot this with the lens wide open at f/4 but the resulting image’s depth of field was too shallow causing the gardener to be overly blurred. By stopping the lens down a few stops to f/9, the desired result was achieved. The body and arms, while still being out of focus, are not too blurry.

Canon 5D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/200 second, f/9, ISO 50

April 19, 2007 at 11:47 pm by | Categories: Post

Pins and Needles

No Comments

Pins and Needles, taken in Lake Havasu City Arizona.

Canon 5D, Canon 70-200 f/4L lens with 1.4x extender – 1/125 second, f/5.6, ISO 50

April 18, 2007 at 11:13 pm by | Categories: Post

Reader Question: Getting Rid of ‘Creepy Eyes’

3 Comments

Frequent blog reader Michelle from the What’s Up Michelle blog dropped me an email yesterday with a question. I asker her if she’d mind if I answered publicly and she gave me the go ahead.

“The camera I use is a Canon A540, digital. When I take photos of my dogs, I get the eye shine. How can I take some candid photos in normal lighting / every day setting, without getting the glowing eyes, which is kinda creepy.”

Great question, Michelle. Camera’s such as yours are designed to do much of the thinking for the photographer. This makes it easy for the novice shooter to simply aim the camera and press the shutter release without having to worry about the various settings. That’s why these type of camera’s are commonly referred to as “Point and Shoot”.

One of the settings that the camera does automatically is the decision of when to use flash. I have noticed with many point-and-shoot models that they use the flash on nearly all shots. Since this flash is located very close to the camera’s lens, its light bounces off the back of your dog’s retinas to create the “creepy” look. Many advanced photographers avoid this “creepiness” by either bouncing their flash off of the ceiling or moving it away from the camera. Unfortunately, neither of these solutions is available for you. A solution I would use is to avoid using the flash for these types of shots and to manually adjust the camera’s settings.

To illustrate this, I borrowed my daughter’s Canon A530 which is very similar to your camera. I then called over Holly, our always willing German Shorthaired Pointer, to serve as a model (it did cost me a piece of cheese).

In the shot on the left I used the camera on the fully automatic setting. Notice how it not only created the “Creepy” eyes, but the flash also overexposed the end of Holly’s nose and created a large shadow. This did not make for a very flattering photograph.

In the other shot (on the right), I put the camera in manual mode, adjusted the aperture to its widest setting to allow in maximum light and disabled the flash. Note how much more even the lighting is on Holly and how her eyes look normal. I feel that this capture looks much more natural and pleasing.

Keep in mind that this method worked in part because I had a good amount of natural light in the room. If the room had been darker it would have been more difficult to get a good result without the flash. For some more information and tips on photographing without a flash, you might refer to a post a did a few weeks back on low light shooting (here’s a link).

I hope this answered your question, Michelle. If any other readers have suggestions as well, I’m sure they’ll chime in.

April 17, 2007 at 11:27 pm by | Categories: tutorial

Leading Lines with Shafer & Sons

No Comments

Yesterday I wrote about the use of Leading Lines in composing a photograph. Today’s capture is another example of this technique. The many lines created by the piano’s keyboard, some subtle and some not, combine to draw the viewer’s focus to a dark vanishing point in the upper right.

Canon 5D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/60 second, F/18, ISO 50

at 8:14 am by | Categories: Post

Photography Tip: Use Leading Lines to enhance the shot

4 Comments

Here’s a quick tip for making your photos more appealing: Leading Lines.

A leading line is a feature within a photograph, either natural or man made, that creates a line from the bottom of the shot moving upward toward the subject. The addition of this to draw the viewers eye into a photograph is a great tool.

When composing a shot, take a moment and see if there is anything that can be used as a leading line. Items like paths, long shadows, natural features and such work very well. The line should begin at or near the bottom of the shot and work its way toward the top – preferably near the main subject. Diagonal lines are sharp and dynamic while curved lines are smooth and graceful.

Today’s featured capture is an example of a smooth and flowing leading line. I captured this winding mountain road just outside of Idyllwild California. While the double yellow line does not lead to a particular ‘subject’, it does create depth to the photo.

In another example of this technique (below), I used the natural feature of a patch of turquoise ice as a leading line. The brightly colored strip draws the viewer’s focus into the lake and ultimately to the snow covered mountains.

Frozen Lakeshore

I find that the use of leading lines improves my shots. Give it a try and see how it works for you.

Road: Canon 30D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/500 second, f/10, ISO 100
Ice: Canon 30D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/80 second, f/16, ISO 100

April 15, 2007 at 11:54 pm by | Categories: tutorial

Quittin’ Time

3 Comments

Quittin’ Time, captured at dusk in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. The smooth appearance of the lake’s water was captured with a relatively long shutter speed of 30 seconds.

Canon 5D, Canon 24-105 f/4L lens – 30 seconds, f/16, ISO 50

April 13, 2007 at 11:50 pm by | Categories: Post

True Friendship

No Comments

Today’s capture epitomizes true friendship to me. This wonderful group of people spend the majority of their winter months living near each other in Arizona. They go bowling, eat barbecue, watch movies, do yard work and much more while enjoying each other’s company. If one couple needs help, the other two are quick to lend a hand. We can all count ourselves as truly fortunate if we have friendships such as this.

Pictured (left to right): Fran, Gene, Chic, David, Mom & Dad

Canon 5D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/30 second, f/4, ISO 100

April 12, 2007 at 11:59 pm by | Categories: Post

A Dollar Saved is a Dollar Earned

4 Comments

“A PENNY DOLLAR SAVED IS A PENNY DOLLAR EARNED”

- Benjamin Franklin
(adjusted for inflation)

Canon 5D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/50 second, f/8, ISO 50

April 11, 2007 at 11:30 pm by | Categories: Post

Saltair, Utah

4 Comments

Saltair, photographed on the southern shore of Utah’s Great Salt Lake.

Canon 5D, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS lens – 1/125 second, f/11, ISO 50

For those readers that have a few minutes to spare, why not fill your brain with some useless facts? Here’s the history of Saltair, Wikipedia style:
__________

Saltair or “The SaltAir” is the name which has been given to several resorts located on the southern shore of the Great Salt Lake in Utah, United States, about fifteen miles from Salt Lake City.

The first Saltair, completed in 1893, was jointly owned by a corporation associated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (commonly called Mormons) and the Salt Lake and Los Angeles Railroad Company (which originally served the site). Saltair was not the first resort built on the shores of the Great Salt Lake, but was the most successful ever built. It rested on over two thousand posts and pilings, many of which remain and are still visible over one hundred and ten years later.

Saltair was a family place, intended to provide a safe and wholesome atmosphere with the open supervision of Church leaders. While some of the other resorts in the area were seen as “spiritually bleak,” a young couple could visit Saltair without worrying about the gossip in the early days when Mormonism was more culturally conservative than it is today. Train schedules from Saltair to stations near home were well known, and so long as the boy got the girl home at a reasonable time after the train arrived, parents weren’t worried — in part because, from the moment of arriving at the station before the outing until they left the station coming home, they were usually never out of sight of trusted members of the Church. More than once, a couple on the way home found themselves in the same car as their parents, who themselves had been dancing at Saltair.

Intended from the beginning as the Western counterpart to Coney Island, Saltair was one of the first amusement parks, and for a time was the most popular family destination west of New York. Some criticism was pointed at the Church over the sale of coffee, tea or alcohol (all of which are prohibited by Mormon doctrine), as well as Saltair’s being open on Sunday.

The first Saltair pavilion and a few other buildings were destroyed by fire in 1925. A new pavilion was built and the resort was expanded at the same location by new investors (again, mostly prominent Mormons), but several factors prevented the second Saltair from achieving the success of its ancestor. The advent of motion pictures and radio, the Great Depression, and the interruption of the “go to Saltair” routine kept people closer to home. With a huge new dance floor — the world’s largest at the time — Saltair became more known as a dance palace, the amusement park becoming secondary to the great travelling bands of the day, such as Glenn Miller. Though Saltair showed motion pictures, there were other theaters more convenient to town.

In addition, the first Saltair had benefitted from its location on the road from Salt Lake City to the Tooele Valley (where it again rests today) and to Skull Valley, which in the late 1800s was home to Iosepa, a large community of Polynesian Mormons. Being near a major intersection, Saltair also served as the first (or last) major facility on the road, making it a popular resting area for those travelling by horseback or wagon. When Saltair was rebuilt, however, this traffic was all but gone. Part of the reason was due to the advent of automobiles, bus and train service to the Tooele Valley, but the other cause was the abandonment of Iosepa, as Polynesians went to homes in the Salt Lake Valley or the community forming around the new LDS Temple in Laie, on Oahu in the Hawaiian Islands.

Saltair thus had to survive solely against strong competition, and in a dwindling market. Disaster struck in 1931, in the form of a fire which caused over $100,000 in damage, then again in 1933 as the resort was left high and dry when lake waters receded (forcing the construction of a miniature railway to carry swimmers between the resort and the water). Saltair was forced to close during the Second World War, which forced the rationing of fuel and other resources while it took many of the resort’s paying customers — and vital employees — out of Utah. Reopening after the war, the resort found the same situation that it had faced in the 1930′s. There were so many other entertainment options, closer to home, and the public was no longer in the habit of going “all the way out there.” The final nail in Saltair’s coffin was television, and the resort closed in 1958 and remains closed for the most part except for performances and special occasions.

Key scenes of the horror cult film released in 1962, Carnival of Souls, were shot in Saltair. A 1960s photo of Saltair was also featured on the cover of the bootleg Beach Boys album, Unsurpassed Masters, Vol. 19.

Attempts over the next decade to breath new life into the resort finally ended in November of 1970, when a fire was set in the center of the wooden dance floor, again destroying Saltair.

Close proximity to Interstate Highway 80, plus new population expansion into the Tooele Valley and the western Salt Lake Valley, prompted the construction of a new Saltair in 1981. The new pavilion was constructed out of a salvaged Air Force aircraft hangar. Once again the lake was a problem, this time flooding the new resort only months after it opened. The waters again receded after several years, and again new investors restored and repaired and planned, only to discover that the waters continued to move away from the site, again leaving it high and dry.

Concerts and other events have been held at the newest facility, but by the end of the 1990s, Saltair was little more than a memory, too small to compete with larger venues which are closer to the public. While there is occasionally activity now and then, through most of the early twenty-first century, the third Saltair was all but abandoned. In 2005 several investors from the music industry pooled together to purchase the building and are now holding regular concerts there. Bands like Dave Matthews Band, The Black Crowes, and other notable hip-hop music and rock music acts have all performed there recently.

Other relics of the age of the Great Salt Lake resorts are nearby, and can be seen from the highway. The most noticeable of these is the skeleton of an old rail car, which sits beside the ruins of an old powerhouse which once fed lights and roller coasters. Rows of pilings snake outward toward the lake, all that remains of the railway trestle and pier which once led to the earlier Saltair resort. The surviving buildings of Lake Park, one of Saltair’s neighbors, were moved to a new site thirty miles away, where the Lagoon Amusement Park has grown around them.

Occasionally used as a backdrop for movies or television shows, Saltair awaits a new life where it stays as music venue currently and is one more of Salt Lake City’s great historical tales.

(reproduced with permission)

April 10, 2007 at 11:50 pm by | Categories: Post