December 2nd, 2008
Blue Bridge
Canon 5D mark II, Canon 20mm f/2.8 – 1/40 second, f/2.8, ISO 3200
- G11 vs 5D Mark II – The Answer
- Canon 5D Mark II vs. Canon G11 – You Decide
- A Visit to the Doctor
- Moving Day
- Movie Theater Models: Standing Out in the Crowd
- Image in Use: Davis Hospital Billboard
- Scary Movie
- Canon G11 Panorama: University of Utah Gymnastics
- Image in Use: Shine from Yahoo
- Kenneth Linge’s “Photographing People” – Tomorrow!
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Hard to believe thats ISO 3200, huh? When did you get the 5D2?
I would like to pose a question to get your opinion. I am president of our local camera club. We have montly competitions and our three categories are Black and White, Color, and Digitally Enhanced. The problem is we struggle in how to define digitally enhanced. Technically any print saved as a JPEG would be considered digitally enhanced but for competitions that would all but eliminate Black and White and Color as categories. So how would you define it?
@austin
I've had it for a week now. Great so far.
@Michael
That's a tough question. Nearly every image these days is "Digitally Enhanced", so where do you draw the line?
I would think a solution might be to come up with an acceptable amount of editing for the color and b&w categories. Stuff like sharpening, exposure adjustment, white balance adjustment, cropping, etc. should be okay. Anything beyond that would put the image in the "Digitally Altered" category.
Today's image is an example. Even though I have applied slight noise reduction, sharpening and color adjustments – I would think it would be a fitting entry for your "Color" category. But if I had gone on and further manipulated the image, it could go into "Digitally Altered"
I hope this helped…
Wow this is amazing. Nice job.
I meet with one of our members tonight to discuss Digitally Enhanced Category. I told him that I think we should consider Digitally Enhanced when there is obvious digital manipulation. To the point were the print no longer looks natural. The other member then suggested adding a new category called Digital Art. That category is easily defined as an artistic manipulation. Digitally Enhanced is still requiring further discussion. Thanks for your feedback and comments.