<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use Wide Angle Lens Distortion for a Creative Portrait</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leggnet.com/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leggnet.com/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucker O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html/comment-page-1#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucker O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s a great couple of shots.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;my friend shoots with a 17-40 f/4l and he loves it, but would the 7mm minimum difference from the 24-105 really be &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; significant for the same situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a great couple of shots.</p>
<p>my friend shoots with a 17-40 f/4l and he loves it, but would the 7mm minimum difference from the 24-105 really be <i>that</i> significant for the same situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Redmon</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html/comment-page-1#comment-1345</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Redmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html#comment-1345</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I saw your comment about wanting the Canon 17-40 f/4L, which is what I leave on my camera all the time...granted, I&#039;m a landscape photographer.  I have a number of other lenses, but it&#039;s just so wide.  I&#039;m still using a 20D, so there&#039;s the conversion factor, but it&#039;s a great setup.  Almost every photo I&#039;ve posted &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.codyredmon.com/gallery.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://codyredmon.blogspot.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; were taken with the 17-40L, I highly recommend it!  Thanks again for your fantastic post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I saw your comment about wanting the Canon 17-40 f/4L, which is what I leave on my camera all the time&#8230;granted, I&#8217;m a landscape photographer.  I have a number of other lenses, but it&#8217;s just so wide.  I&#8217;m still using a 20D, so there&#8217;s the conversion factor, but it&#8217;s a great setup.  Almost every photo I&#8217;ve posted <a HREF="http://www.codyredmon.com/gallery.html" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">HERE</a> and <a HREF="http://codyredmon.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">HERE</a> were taken with the 17-40L, I highly recommend it!  Thanks again for your fantastic post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Krisher</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html/comment-page-1#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Krisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>I wrote a post about the 17-40! check it out here: &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://shaunkrisher.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/bang-for-buck-17-40-f4-or-16-35-f28/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a post about the 17-40! check it out here: </p>
<p><a href="http://shaunkrisher.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/bang-for-buck-17-40-f4-or-16-35-f28/" rel="nofollow">http://shaunkrisher.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/bang-for-buck-17-40-f4-or-16-35-f28/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Smith</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html/comment-page-1#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2008/01/use-wide-angle-lens-distortion-for-a-creative-portrait.html#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>That bride picture is pretty wicked.  I would be interested in seeing what it would look like with a 17mm on the 5D.  You better order that lens this week  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That bride picture is pretty wicked.  I would be interested in seeing what it would look like with a 17mm on the 5D.  You better order that lens this week  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

