<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sepia Tone Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leggnet.com/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leggnet.com/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genevieve</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Genevieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>I like this photo.  The angles of the arms and legs are interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this photo.  The angles of the arms and legs are interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harley</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Interesting!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, why did they add the pigment in the first place?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Did they just like the different tone?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Or did they know the chemical differences would make the photos more resistant to aging? If so, how did they know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!</p>
<p>So, why did they add the pigment in the first place?</p>
<p>Did they just like the different tone?</p>
<p>Or did they know the chemical differences would make the photos more resistant to aging? If so, how did they know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeggNet</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>LeggNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The cuttlefish is not a fish. Rather it is a cephalopod&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Ahhh... the professor has spoken :)  Thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The cuttlefish is not a fish. Rather it is a cephalopod</i></p>
<p>Ahhh&#8230; the professor has spoken :)  Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BWJones</title>
		<link>http://leggnet.com/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>BWJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leggnet.com/wp/2007/09/sepia-tone-photography.html#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Ah, minor detail here....  The cuttlefish is not a fish.  Rather it is a cephalopod (like octopus or squid) that has an amazing intellect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, minor detail here&#8230;.  The cuttlefish is not a fish.  Rather it is a cephalopod (like octopus or squid) that has an amazing intellect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

